The Wealth of the Church

Does the Church miss-use its money?

Its good question, and in many ways it can appear that the answer is yes. It is easy to find evidence to support the gluttony of the Church. Simply speak of its massive buildings and the "lavish' lifestyle of the pope and bishops. Simply speak of the Church's "refusal" to spend money on the poor but rather to build bigger cathedrals and renovate the current ones.

There are countless arguments for the Church's misuse of money, however, I only have time to counter the ones mentioned above.

To answer these questions I did some research on the argument.

First, lets talk about the "lavish" lifestyle of the pope. Lets make it clear, the pope himself does not live in a mansion, but in an apartment no larger than ten rooms. The rooms of this apartment are dedicated to the necessities of being a religious man. He has a bedroom, a library, bathrooms, a study, and living rooms. There are no media rooms or indoor pools in this building. The white house on the other hand has all sorts of unnecessary additives including a pool. So why doesn't the president ever come under the same accusations? It is because, just like the pope, the president is elected into office and is allowed to use the public property which comes along with the position, most of it being a necessity for performing the position itself (excluding the pool of course).

Second lets talk about the Church spending "too much money" on Cathedrals and too little on the poor. First of all, let it be said that a Cathedral is a statement of our love for God and a home for his real body and blood. It is really acceptable for a wealthy community to have a small shack of a church where they worship? Doesn't that say something about where they prioritize God in their lives if they go home to a wealthy lifestyle? It there therefore necessary to spend a reasonable amount of money on our churches. But there is more to it than that. Many of the Churches that come under fire are the ancient ones like St. Peter's and Notre Dame. However, the truth is, that when these churches where built, a Cathedral was one of the best investments a medieval town could make. Along with the spiritual aspects, the build site of a cathedral would provide much needed jobs for up to a century. In addition, they became beacons of learning and knowledge in the dark age and would attract pilgrims that would in turn need food and lodging, therefore sustaining the towns income.

Take the Vatican for instance, St. Peter's is nearly a thousand years old. The Church does not nearly have enough funds to build a new one, and even if it did It would not allow the funds. The Vatican merely maintains what it has, which it does on a budget less than that of Harvard University. Furthermore, those that claim the Church does not help the poor should know that the Catholic Church is, among many things, the largest charity organization in the world.